|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 2, 2007 23:32:33 GMT -8
 Raleigh, you should ditch your drum and grab one of these bad boys. |
|
|
|
Post by Christian on Jul 4, 2007 9:26:36 GMT -8
hahaha that would be so annoying and heavy though but it could work as a bipod supplmenenet
|
|
|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 4, 2007 11:16:02 GMT -8
It really would work as a bipod.
|
|
Ryan
Lietenant Colonel
Posts: 488
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 4, 2007 14:35:57 GMT -8
that would be awsome
|
|
|
|
Post by slick on Jul 4, 2007 21:21:43 GMT -8
that thing looks irritating
|
|
|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 4, 2007 22:43:45 GMT -8
Raleigh, you can use it as a bipod!
|
|
|
|
Post by slick on Jul 6, 2007 19:20:04 GMT -8
or a... unipod
|
|
|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 6, 2007 19:33:38 GMT -8
True.
|
|
|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 11, 2007 1:09:51 GMT -8
I think this is for the real deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by DualDragons on Jul 12, 2007 10:50:31 GMT -8
No joke, when I saw that, it made me want to throw up. I can't even imagine how impractical that rifle is, oh no, yes I can!  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChauchatLook at the magazine on that and read the battlefield performance in the link. It was used in WWI by the French and US forces. We had the BAR in 1917, just in time for us to go to war with it, but it was thought to be so technically advanced that the US were afraid of it falling into enemy hands. So the Chauchat took its place and we don't know how many lives it claimed by jamming in the battlefield and crucial moments. |
|
|
|
Post by Christian A. on Jul 12, 2007 22:46:24 GMT -8
I had no idea the BAR was around in 1917.
|
|
